{"color":"DEFAULT","isTrashed":false,"isPinned":false,"isArchived":false,"textContent":"Luc Trudel  9:36 AM\n\nKirk Wiebe\n\nHi Bill,\nI wanted to ask you something.\nIn your proof that there was no hacking into the DNC and that it was in fact a local transfer to a USB key, you make this determination based on the File Allocation Table (FAT) metadata.\nMy question may be silly but how are you able to be sure that the files did not pick up this metadata from a subsequent transfer to USB after an initial hack to transfer the files (slowly) remotely over the network by hacking?\n---\n\nyou need to google \"NSA Fairview.\"  this will show you the fiberoptic\ntap points on the internal US fiber network that NSA uses to collect and store communications data on all of us.  they use the NARUS \nINSIGHT equipment to do the collection.  this can capture everything on the lines.  If there was an intermediate hack, NSA would have evidence of it.  Fact that they only had moderate confidence in the 2017 ICA means they did not have a thing.  further, no one has produced any evidence of what you suggest.\n\n\nLuc Trudel  9:36 AM\n\nHi Bill,\nI wanted to ask you something.\nIn your proof that there was no hacking into the DNC and that it was in fact a local transfer to a USB key, you make this determination based on the File Allocation Table (FAT) metadata.\nMy question may be silly but how are you able to be sure that the files did not pick up this metadata from a subsequent transfer to USB after an initial hack to transfer the files (slowly) remotely over the network by hacking?\nWilliam Binney sent the following message at 10:15 AM\nView William\u2019s profileWilliam Binney\nWilliam Binney  10:15 AM\n\nyou need to google \"NSA Fairview.\"  this will show you the fiberoptic\ntap points on the internal US fiber network that NSA uses to collect and store communications data on all of us.  they use the NARUS \nINSIGHT equipment to do the collection.  this can capture everything on the lines.  If there was an intermediate hack, NSA would have evidence of it.  Fact that they only had moderate confidence in the 2017 ICA means they did not have a thing.  further, no one has produced any evidence of what you suggest.\nLuc Trudel sent the following messages at 10:24 AM\nView Luc\u2019s profileLuc Trudel\nLuc Trudel  10:24 AM\n\nOk thank you Bill. \n\nDo you have a link to the report of your teams's analysis.  Does it mention if they had access to anything other than the files available on wikileaks to work with?\n\nAlso, I just learned about the secret program Grasshopper, part of vault7.  Do you have any insights or comments to share on this program and how it was used?\nView Luc\u2019s profileLuc Trudel\nLuc Trudel  10:44 AM\n\nAlso, are you aware of anyone having created an animation (video) or simulation (video) that helps laymen understand your proof?\nWilliam Binney sent the following messages at 2:25 PM\nView William\u2019s profileWilliam Binney\nWilliam Binney  2:25 PM\n\nI have given lectures in EU countries, the UK and thew US at universities (like Cambridge, Oxford, Heidelberg, and others) plus large numbers of CIO's of companies both in Europe and the US.  these are on line at Youtube - just google my name.\nView William\u2019s profileWilliam Binney\nWilliam Binney  2:29 PM\n\ni assume most of Vault 7 programs. came from NSA and were renamed by CIA. So, i'v not researched \"Grasshopper.\"\nSeen by William Binney at 1595788179569.\nLuc Trudel sent the following message at 2:40 PM\nView Luc\u2019s profileLuc Trudel\nLuc Trudel  2:40 PM\n\nthank you.\n\n","title":"","userEditedTimestampUsec":1595790355817000,"createdTimestampUsec":1595770666893000}